Latest News

Policy Analysis for California Education (PACE) is an independent, non-partisan research center based at the University of California – Berkeley, the University of Southern California, and Stanford University. PACE seeks to define and sustain a long-term strategy for comprehensive policy reform and continuous improvement in performance at all levels of California’s education system, from early childhood to post-secondary education and training. PACE bridges the gap between research and policy, working with scholars from California’s leading universities and with state and local policymakers to increase the impact of academic research on educational policy in California.


Effects of the California High School Exit Exam on Student Persistence, Achievement, and Graduation

A new PACE policy brief summarizes the findings from a study investigating the impact of the California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE) on California’s lowest performing students. Utilizing longitudinal data from four large urban school districts, Sean Reardon from Stanford and Michal Kurlaender from UC-Davis compare students scheduled to graduate just before (2005) and after (2006-07) the exit exam became a requirement for graduation from California high schools. They find that the CAHSEE requirement had no positive effects on students’ academic skills, and a large negative impact on graduation rates that fell disproportionally on minority students and on female students. The authors conclude that policymakers should reevaluate the utility of the high school exit exam in California’s accountability system.

cover

Register now for “Leading and Learning in CA Schools: Preparing and Supporting Effective School Leaders”

Upcoming Conference: September 25, 2009
Co-Sponsored by California Commission on Teacher Credentialing & Policy Analysis for California Education
“Leading and Learning in CA Schools: Preparing and Supporting Effective School Leaders”

Date: Friday, September 25, 2009
Time: 9:00am-3:00pm Lunch will be provided.
Location: Department of Health Services Auditorium, 1500 Capitol Avenue, Sacramento, CA 95811

Featured Speakers:

Pedro Garcia – University of Southern California and former Superintendent, Metro Nashville Public Schools
Susanna Loeb – Stanford University

The Commission on Teacher Credentialing and Policy Analysis for California Education are co-sponsoring a one day conference looking at preparing effective school leaders on September 25, 2009. This is a free, one day seminar for researchers, the policy community, district and school administrators and faculty. This seminar will offer research perspectives on effective leadership in educational settings, examine their use in context, and explore their implications for policy and future systemic change in California.

The seminar will feature presentations by education and business leaders including Richard Rothstein from the Economic Policy Institute, Craig LaFargue from Lee Hecht Harrison, and Mary Alice Callahan from the California Federation of Teachers. There is no cost to attend this event, however you must register. Lunch is included. The deadline to register is September 11, 2009. Space is available on a first-come, first-served basis.

Registration and the tentative program schedule are available at: http://www.ctc.ca.gov/seminars/seminars.html

Save the Date! – September 25, 2009

Leading and Learning in CA Schools: Preparing and Supporting Effective School Leaders

A free one day seminar for researchers, the policy community, school leaders and faculty featuring speakers from many perspectives. This seminar will offer research perspectives on effective leadership in educational settings, examine their use in context, and explore their implications for policy and future systemic change in California.
 
Featured Speakers:

Pedro Garcia – University of Southern California
Susanna Loeb – Stanford University

Department of Health Services Auditorium 
1500 Capitol Avenue 
Sacramento, CA 95811 
 
Registration will begin in mid August

download the flyer HERE

The Quality Teacher and Education Act in San Francisco: Lessons Learned

This policy brief reviews the recent experience of the San Francisco Unified School District (SFUSD) with the development and approval of Proposition A. Proposition A (also known as the Quality Teacher and Education Act, or QTEA) included a parcel tax mainly dedicated to increasing teachers’ salaries, along with a variety of measures introducing flexibility to the current salary schedule and strengthening accountability for teacher performance. Based on interviews with key stakeholders in the district, Hough describes how the district and union worked together in SFUSD both to increase general compensation and also to introduce new compensation strategies that support closer alignment between school district goals and expenditures for teacher salaries.

cover

May 29th Seminar Podcast

pace seminarAn audio broadcast of our recent seminar “Resources, Incentives and Accountability: Overhauling California’s System of School Finance” featuring Eric Hanushek of The Hoover Institution at Stanford University is now available.

Spurred by court rulings requiring states to increase public school funding, the United States now spends more per student on K-12 education than almost any other country. Yet American students still achieve less than their foreign counterparts, their performance has been flat for decades, millions of them are failing, and poor and minority students remain far behind their more advantaged peers. In this seminar, Eric Hanushek concludes that the principal focus of both courts and legislatures on ever-increasing funding has done little to improve student achievement. Instead, Hanushek proposes a performance-based system that directly links funding to success in raising student achievement. This system would empower and motivate educators to make better, more cost-effective decisions about how to run their schools, ultimately leading to improved student performance.

Eric A. Hanushek is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University. His most recent book (with Alfred A. Lindseth) is Schoolhouses, Courthouses, and Statehouses: Solving the Funding-Achievement Puzzle in America’s Public Schools, published by Princeton University Press in 2009. The speaker was introduced by PACE’s Executive Director David N. Plank.

Download Mr. Hanushek’s Powerpoint presentation.

Listen to the audio of this seminar: (note: the recording starts a few seconds late)



Download this audio file to your computer (zip)

May 22 Seminar Podcast

pace seminarAn audio broadcast of our recent seminar “What Now? Improving Schools Within Budget Constraints” featuring W. Norton Grubb of the University of California, Berkeley.

As California continues to wrestle with the challenge of providing sufficient funding for our state’s schools, understanding the relationships among school funding, effective school resources, and outcomes is essential. In this seminar Norton Grubb addressed four principal questions: (1) What kinds of school resources make a difference to outcomes? (2) Why is the relationship between spending per student and outcomes so weak, and how can that help California schools in a time of fiscal crisis? (3) Why are outcomes so inequitable, including the role of race and ethnicity? (4) What should California do now, in both school finance and other areas of school policy, to avoid further damage to the state’s education system?

W. Norton Grubb is a professor and the David Gardner Chair in Higher Education at the School of Education, the University of California, Berkeley. His most recent book is The Money Myth: School Resources, Outcomes, and Equity, published in 2009 by the Russell Sage Foundation, New York. The speaker was introduced by PACE’s Executive Director David N. Plank.

Download Professor Grubb’s Powerpoint presentation.

Listen to the audio of this seminar:



Download this audio file to your computer (zip)

May 8th Seminar Podcast

pace seminarAn audio broadcast of our recent seminar “Designing Categorical Grants to Support Student Learning” featuring Lawrence O. Picus with comments by John Mockler is now available.

As part of the Legislature’s February 2009 budget revisions, school districts were granted more flexibility in the use of some categorical grants. These actions offer an exceptional opportunity to reform California’s confusing system of categorical grants. Flexibility in the use of categorical grant funding creates a paradox because categorical programs are established to focus school resources on high priority programs. Allowing alternative use of these funds is both counter-productive and suggests lack of focus in the mix of categorical programs available. This session provided an overview of the purposes of categorical grants, discussed issues pertaining to local v. state control over the use of educational resources and described Picus’ recent research on ways to structure categorical grants to improve student performance. Picus offered suggestions for ways California’s myriad of confusing categorical programs can be reformed to focus on student learning. John Mockler offered some comments on Picus’ presentation.

Lawrence O. Picus is professor of education at the USC Rossier School of Education. His research focuses on school finance and the allocation and use of educational resources to improve student learning. He has conducted school finance adequacy studies in a number of states, and helped design the school funding systems in Wyoming, Arkansas and North Dakota. Ohio is currently considering a funding system based on his work.

John Mockler is the president of John Mockler and Associates, Inc., a consulting firm in Sacramento. He is the former Executive Director of the California State Board of Education and the former Interim Secretary for Education for the State of California. The speaker was introduced by PACE’s Executive Director David N. Plank.

Listen to the audio of this seminar:



Download this audio file to your computer (zip)

April 24th Seminar Podcast

pace seminarAn audio broadcast of our recent seminar “Effects of the California High School Exit Exam on Student Achievement and Graduation” featuring Sean F. Reardon and Michal Kurlaender is now available.

Sean F. Reardon is Associate Professor of Education and (by courtesy) Sociology at Stanford University, whose research focuses on the causes and consequences of educational and social inequality. Michal Kurlaender is Assistant Professor of Education at University of California, Davis. Her research focuses on education policy in K-12 and higher education. Student-level data from four large California school districts was used to examine the impact of the CAHSEE exam on student achievement and graduation rates. In particular, they focus of the effects of failing vs. passing the CAHSEE in 10th grade on the subsequent achievement and graduation rate of students with relatively low math and ELA skills. The speakers were introduced by PACE’s Executive Director David N. Plank.

Listen to the audio of this seminar:



Download this audio file to your computer (zip)